Categories
Activities Cole Current Events Health Ryan Work

A Sick Weekend & Go Rockies!

Cole came down with a cold last week, and by this weekend, Joe, Ryan, and myself had it too.  Joe seems to get over colds in a day or two, but I always get them for a week. 

My sore throat is gone, but now I have laryngitis and a cough.  Ryan has a stuffy, running nose, and a little cough.  Cole still has a runny nose.  Joe has a runny nose.

I am sure Joe will be feeling better today, but I am still not feeling 100%.  Of course, I have a lot of work I am trying to do- my clients month-end, and quarter-end books, work from my job that I can do from home, and trying to take care of the boys too. 

I usually do all my job and work stuff at night, but Joe and I have become very involved in the baseball playoffs- mainly watching the Colorado Rockies; their incredible winning streak and play.  I am not that big of a baseball fan, but I grew up watching the Chicago Cubs, because my brother was a fan.  I haven’t been to a baseball game in a few years, but watching the Rockies is so much fun! They are just doing great!  So needless to say, I have been playing “hooky” from work.  Hopefully, they will sweep the Diamondbacks tonight, and I can get caught up before the World Series starts! 

In other news, I started working a half day on Thursdays and leaving the boys with a wonderful daycare provider that was referred to me.  She only takes “part-time” kids, and the boys love her!  Ryan keeps asking if he can go back to her house.  I’ll probably write another posting about this subject soon.

Fall has arrived- we had cool temperatures over the weekend, and lots of fog and rain.  With all of us being sick, and the boys not being able to go outside, we all had a major case of cabin fever!  On Saturday we ventured outside to get some lunch at a somewhat healthier fast food chain, that has a really nice indoor playground.  The boys loved that!  Then we took a drive to a town we are thinking about moving to, to see if there were any new houses for sale.

On our way out to the restaurant, we did a “drive-by” on another house, just a few blocks away from where we are now, that a friend told us about that was for sale. The outside looked really nice and the yard was a decent size, and it was in a nice neighborhood- one that I didn’t even realize was so close to us.

We called the realtor and looked at it yesterday, but the inside needed some work, and the kitchen was too small.  This weekend really got to Joe and I- we need something bigger with these two, active boys! 

It seems like everytime we start to get serious about moving, something happens and we have to wait, or postpone our new house search.  So, we aren’t really looking- just checking out the market.  🙂

Go Rockies!

Categories
Cooking Current Events Health

Thoughts on Organic Food

I have been reading a lot lately about organic food, and healthy cooking options.  Crunchy Domestic Goddess also just wrote a blog post about this topic, and after leaving a comment on her blog about it, it got me thinking.

We have always tried to eat healthy and have sweets and “junk” food in moderation.  When I was growing up, it was a cold day- you know where- if we got candy, or any sweets.  My mother was a health-nut.  I can honestly say, I have NEVER had a Twinkie in my life.  When my siblings and I got to high school, we “rebelled.”  Suddenly we could go off campus to eat lunch at McDonald’s, buy junk food at the school store, or even buy a Coke in the vending machine.

Before I got pregnant for the first time, I became very interested in nutrition and healthy eating.  I knew I’d be trying to conceive and wanted to get my body ready and be able to provide excellent nutrition for my growing baby.  When I was pregnant with both boys, I tried to eat the healthiest I ever have.  If there is one time to eat organic whenever you can, growing a new human in you is the time.  I figured I only got one chance to nourish my babies while in-utero.  Not to say, I didn’t have the cravings for ice cream, and some junk food, but I tried not to go overboard.

Now as a mother, of two young children, of course I want them to eat healthy and to make smart choices for themselves as well.  I don’t think taking the hard never-have-a-piece-of-candy- line that my mom did is the right choice for us.  I know she believed she was doing what she thought was right for us, but at times my siblings and I were like sugar junkies- anytime someone offered us some sugar, we HAD to have it, because we never, never, got it at home. 

Obviously I don’t want to go the other way, where Ryan and Cole eat a lot of sugar or junk food.  So, we are trying to teach junk food in moderation.  Yes, it is okay to have an oatmeal cookie that I baked, but only after dinner is eaten which consisted of either a fruit or vegetable.  They also have fruit and veggies at every meal.  Not to say they eat all of them every time, but they usually will manage to eat some of it.  They love strawberries, so anytime I serve those, I know they will gobble them up.

I try to buy organic produce, dairy, and other organic natural products when I can.  I believe children’s bodies are more susceptible to chemicals, and I don’t want to just give them food laced with chemicals and preservatives if options exist where we don’t have to. 

However, it is becoming frustrating, because it seems like it is no longer “acceptable” to just buy organic.  I was just reading an article in Better Nutrition, called True Spirit of Organics, which said this:

“But opponents object to large-scale farming and the potential softening of organic standards that they fear may follow in the wake of Wal-Mart’s organic crusade.

“It all depends on your perspective,” says Bob Scowcroft, executive director of the Organic Farming Research Foundation, a nonprofit organization based in Santa Cruz, Calif. “If you’re an environmental activist, you might say ‘What’s wrong with a 10,000-acre operation going organic? You’ve just removed tons of pesticides from the environment.’ If you’re a family farmer who’s struggled for 20 years, and suddenly your highly valued apple is being underpriced by superstores, you’ll be concerned.”

On the other hand, while large-scale organic farms follow the letter of the law, they may stray from the original ideals of organic farming. Critics point out that the spirit of organics includes a philosophy of food production that promotes ethical treatment of workers and livestock, emphasizes locally grown produce (thereby reducing the amount of fuel required for transportation), and supports small farms.”

What is a consumer to do?  Support lower organic prices, so more people can benefit, or support the organic farmer by buying higher priced organics?  It just doesn’t seem like you can win. If you mention that you eat organic food to group A, they will think it is great.  It seems like the tide is moving in the direction though, if you mention that you buy organic food at Wal-Mart- not so great. 

I am all for fair treatment of workers, animals and for fair prices.  I also am concerned with the environment, but it seems like we are constantly being bombarded that we have to not only be concerned with what our families are eating, but how the land is being used, how the animals are being treated, and how the workers working on the farm are being treated. I mean if you take all of this as seriously as the outlets that put it out, it would hard to eat food from anywhere, without paying an outrageous amount of money, or only being able to eat a few local items that are in season, if you could find a farmer selling them.   

I have yet to see an article that criticizes Super Target, or Costco for carrying organic food.  Surely these companies aren’t going down the road either to buy all their organics from Farmer Bob in their communities.  I saw an article about a year ago on MSN called, The Dark Secrets of Whole Foods, which highlighted among other things, that Whole Foods, doesn’t buy the majority of their organic produce from local farmers, even though they have pictures of local farmers holding produce in their stores. A quote from a small family farmer in Connecticut from this story said,

     “Almost all the organic food in this country comes out of California. And five or six big California farms dominate the whole industry.”

At the time this story was written the reporter noticed that the only local produce in a New York Whole Foods, was a shelf of apples, but all the local farmer produce banners were up. 

Why all the criticism then when Wal-Mart brings organic food in?  It seems like it should be a good thing because one, they are lowering the prices on healthier food for people who might not be able to afford it otherwise, and two, more farm land is being converted and used to grow organic, which is better for the environment. 

It just seems weird that we are being told that buying organics from Superstores, isn’t acceptable, when it doesn’t seem like ANY store- Wal-Mart, Costco, or Whole Foods buys the majority of their organics from local farmers either. 

I think it is somewhat hypocritical to try to push the local produce aspect on consumers, when the stores themselves aren’t buying local.  It also makes me wonder how this can be regulated somewhat, so if consumers do choose to support their local farmers they can be assured the produce they are buying really is local.

The article on Whole Foods  also made a good point when it asked if you live in New York, is it better to buy tomatoes that aren’t organic that come from New Jersey, because the damage done to the environment is less when you factor in fuel, and transportation factors, or to buy organic tomatoes from Chile, where there has been a substantial amount of energy loss and environmental damage involved in them being shipped to New York?

I have decided that eating any food without chemicals is better for my family.  I try to buy my state’s local organic products first, but if they don’t have them, I have always been a bargain hunter, so if I see organics for less at Costco, versus my local health food store (which I love, and no, it isn’t Whole Foods), I will more than likely buy it at Costco.   

In the end, I think all consumers can do is do what they feel is best for their families health and budget.  But, I don’t think anyone should feel bad, or guilty if they can’t or choose not to buy organic.  After all, it may not even be local, and could be more harmful to the environment than the local conventional food in their stores. 

Categories
Cole Current Events Health

Thomas We Don’t Love You

Thomas the Tank Engine is pretty big in our house, as I imagine it is, in most households with toddlers and pre-schoolers.

By now, hopefully you are aware of one of the first toy recalls from China, involved Thomas train items- specifically trains and toys with red paint on them, like James, etc.  I was horrified to find that we had one of the James trains on the recall list for unacceptable levels of lead paint.  I was even more horrified to see that almost all the paint was gone- and I know where- probably down my sweet 16 month-old’s throat.

Cole chews on everything, so it wasn’t a stretch to think he was chewing on the train and the paint peeled off.  Then I remembered that my step-grandmother had given the boys that particular train, which were from her grandsons, who are 8 and 6.  So it is possible the paint could have been chipped off long before it made its way into Cole’s mouth, but it still has me nervous.

I meant to have the Dr. do a lead test on Cole at his check-up last month, but totally spaced it out!  Duh, so we’ll have to make an appointment for that, to make sure Cole doesn’t have lead poisoning. 

It blows my mind that the company who makes Thomas items, RC2 Corp. didn’t have tighter control standards on these toys.  What is worse in my mind, is have you ever bought a Thomas Train?  They aren’t cheap.  They usually run over $10 for ONE train.  If they have a coal car, or tender car, with it, it is more like $20. 

Obviously RC2 wasn’t putting this money into ensuring their products were safe, and their Chinese manufacturers were following guidelines for lead paint.  It makes me mad, because when you spend that kind of money for toys for your children, they should be safe, and parents EXPECT them to be safe.  I still have the James train sitting on my desk; I just haven’t gotten around to sending it back.  Turns out, that may have been a good thing. 

RC2 is caught in another embarrassing fiasco.  Evidently after the first recall, they sent out Thomas items as gifts to their “loyal” customers, who had returned tainted items during the first recall, thanking them for their loyalty.  About 2,000 of those gift items are now being recalled for- yes, you guessed it- unacceptable levels of lead in the paint!

How this was allowed to happen, is beyond me, and what a public relations nightmare for RC2!  You think they would check, re-check, and double-check again their products, before sending another lead tainted toy back to their “loyal” customers.  Gee- with that kind of gift, I think I’ll pass. Thanks but no thanks.  Click here to read the entire story.

My boys love Thomas, but I have zero confidence in RC2 that they have the ability to monitor and assure me that their toys are safe.  I doubt we buy any more Thomas items any time soon.  For now, sorry Thomas, we don’t love you.

All these recalls from China prove that yes, companies can save a buck in the short term, by using cheap labor, but in the end, it may cost them way more in profits, due to recalls, lost sales, and consumer confidence, then any savings they gained by manufacturing in China. 

Young children under the age of seven, are very sensitive to lead, and it can cause a number of  problems ranging from learning difficulties and lower IQ’s, to kidney problems, confusion, belly pain, headaches, seizures, and brain problems. 

In case you aren’t aware, toys manufactured in the USA don’t use lead in their paint, and toys manufactured in Europe, and especially in Germany, have some of the highest toy safety standards in the world- even more stringent than the USA.  So buy your toys from the good ol’ USA, or Europe. 

It isn’t worth risking your child’s health and development for toys and for companies who choose to put their profits above the safety of children. 

Categories
Books / Reading c-sections Current Events Pregnancy & Birth

Excellent Article on Disturbing C-Section Trend

The other day, while browsing through my local newspaper, I came across this excellent article on the alarming c-section rate (more on that in a moment) from Jennifer Block, author of “Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care.”

I have never heard about this book before, and after reading the review of it on Amazon, it sounds fascinating!  I will definitely have to read this- here are a few lines from the review:

“…the United States has the most intense and widespread medical management of birth” in the world, and yet “ranks near the bottom among industrialized countries in maternal and infant mortality.” Block shows how, in transforming childbirth into a business, hospitals have turned “procedures and devices developed for the treatment of abnormality” into routine practice, performed for no reason than “speeding up and ordering an unpredictable…process”

Back to the article that was in my paper- it was originally published in the LA Times, and I do not get that paper, so it was nice to see that other newspapers are picking up and actually running these kinds of stories.  The title of the article is: The C-Section Epidemic.

I loved this article and in my opinion, Ms. Block is right on, regarding the sad state of C-section rates.  In my case, I found her words to be unfortunate, but true, regarding hospitals and doctors use of repeat C-sections instead of promoting VBAC’s (vaginal birth after cesarean), when she writes (bold print mine),

“Too many caesareans are literally medical overkill. Yet some U.S. hospitals are now delivering half of all babies surgically. Across the nation, 1 in 4 low-risk first-time mothers will give birth via caesarean, and if they have more children, 95% will be born by repeat surgery. In many cases, women have no choice in the matter. Though vaginal birth after caesarean is a low-risk event, hundreds of institutions have banned it, and many doctors will no longer attend it because of malpractice liability.”

My local hospital, which is all but five minutes away, has banned VBAC’s.  I wrote the administration, doctors on staff, and the board of directors there, questioning why they will not allow women to choose VBAC’s, and it came down to the insurance factor. 

Women’s lives are being put in danger, needlessly.  I have written before urging anyone who may be faced with a c-section to do your research, and realize that it is major abdominal surgery, with risks of complications and infections, much higher than normal vaginal birth.  Don’t get a c-section, merely for the convenience of the hospital and or doctor’s if it isn’t medically necessary.   Once you have had a C-section, it is becoming increasingly hard and in some places, nearly impossible, to have a VBAC birth, with subsequent pregnancies. 

I liked Ms. Block’s article so much, I am going to post the entire article at the end of my post, so you don’t even have to click a link to read it. Every woman should read this article. It might not relate to you directly, but you can share it, if you have a sister, a daughter, a cousin, a daughter-in-law, a granddaughter, a son (yes, we need to start educating our sons on this subject as well), or a friend facing a possble C-section.  It is valuable information, which could save her life.

I think these new statistics from the CDC should be a huge wake-up call to the medical community, and everyone-really, which proves C-sections that are not medically necessary, are hurting women, and in some cases killing them.  This disturbing trend must change!  What will it take?  If not now, when?

The C-Section Epidemic

More women are dying in childbirth thanks to the high numbers of doctors and mothers who opt out of normal delivery.

By Jennifer Block
September 24, 2007

Pre-term births are on the rise. Nearly one-third of women have major abdominal surgery to give birth. And compared with other industrialized countries, the United States ranks second-to-last in infant survival. For years, these numbers have suggested something is terribly amiss in delivery wards. Now there is even more compelling evidence that the U.S. maternity care system is failing: For the first time in decades, the number of women dying in childbirth has increased.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention last month released 2004 data showing a rate of 13.1 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. For a country that considers itself a leader in medical technology, this figure should be a wake-up call. In Scandinavian countries, about 3 per 100,000 women die, which is thought to be the irreducible minimum. The U.S. remains far from that. Even more disturbing is the racial disparity: Black women are nearly four times as likely to die during childbirth than white women, with a staggering rate of 34.7 deaths per 100,000.

These high rates aren’t a surprise to anyone who’s been investigating childbirth deaths. Physician researchers who have conducted local case reviews across the country consistently have found death rates much higher than what the CDC has been reporting. In New York City between 2003 and 2005, researchers found a death rate of 22.9 per 100,000; in Florida between 1999 and 2002, the rate was 17.6. Other reports by CDC epidemiologists have acknowledged that deaths related to childbirth are probably underreported by a factor of two to three.

What’s to blame for the poor U.S. showing? True, we are the only industrialized country without universal healthcare. But when it comes to childbirth, we basically have it. Ninety-nine percent of women give birth in a hospital with access to all the bells and whistles — high-tech machines that continuously monitor the baby’s heart rate, drugs that can control the speed of contractions like the volume on a stereo, instruments that can coax a reluctant head out of the birth canal, and surgeons at the ready to perform the mother of all interventions, the caesarean section.

The C-section, now used to deliver 30% of American babies, is such a norm these days that, in some places, doctors and women have taken to calling it “C-birth” or even just “having a ‘C.'” Pet names aside, the procedure is major surgery, and although it saves lives when performed as an emergency intervention, it causes more harm than good when overused. Here’s why: Caesareans are inherently riskier than normal, vaginal birth. They also lead to repeat caesareans. And repeat caesareans carry even greater risks.

Placenta accreta is one of them. The placenta embeds into the uterine scar from a previous surgery, causing a catastrophic hemorrhage at the time of delivery. Most women with placenta accreta lose their uteri; as many as 1 in 15 bleed to death. In 1970, accretas were so rare that most obstetricians never encountered one in their career. Today, according to a University of Chicago study, the incidence may be as high as 1 in 500 births. And that is all because of caesareans and repeat caesareans.

Obesity plays a part as well because obese women are more likely to have health problems that make a caesarean more likely, and more likely to suffer surgical complications. Still, it all comes back to the “C,” which could easily stand for “culprit.”  

According to a sweeping 2006 study by the World Health Organization, published last year in the medical journal Lancet, a hospital’s caesarean rate should not exceed 15%. When it does, women suffer more infections, hemorrhages and deaths, and babies are more likely to be born prematurely or die.

Too many caesareans are literally medical overkill. Yet some U.S. hospitals are now delivering half of all babies surgically. Across the nation, 1 in 4 low-risk first-time mothers will give birth via caesarean, and if they have more children, 95% will be born by repeat surgery. In many cases, women have no choice in the matter. Though vaginal birth after caesarean is a low-risk event, hundreds of institutions have banned it, and many doctors will no longer attend it because of malpractice liability.

American maternity wards are fast becoming surgical suites. We’ve become dangerously cavalier about it, but the caesarean rate should be a major public health concern. Universal care alone won’t solve the problem; what pregnant women need is entirely different care. They need doctors and hospitals that promote normal labor and delivery. Of course, reducing obesity belongs on the healthcare agenda, and so does curtailing the scalpel.

Jennifer Block is the author of “Pushed: The Painful Truth About Childbirth and Modern Maternity Care.”

Categories
Breastfeeding Current Events

UPDATE: Nursing Mom Gets Extra Time For Test

Here is an update on the story of Sophie Currier, the nursing mother of a 4-month old, who sued the National Board of Medical Examiners, because they would not allow her extra breaks to pump, during her nine hour medical licensing exam. 

An appeals court judge ruled on Wednesday, that she must be given extra time for breaks. 

Good for Sophie, for challenging the ruling, and it looks like she missed her first test date, since she was suing, but is set to take the test now on October 4th and 5th.  Good luck to her on the exam, and this is a great story on how one person CAN make a difference.

Here is the link if you want to read the entire story.

https://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/B/BREAST_FEEDING_DISPUTE?SITE=FLSTU&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT